<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Benchmarks of Interest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tapaninaho.com/blog/2006/05/benchmarks-of-interest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tapaninaho.com/blog/2006/05/benchmarks-of-interest/</link>
	<description>Kristian Tapaninaho’s place to write and share ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:36:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapaninaho &#124; Photoshop 10 (CS3) Beta Benchmarking</title>
		<link>http://tapaninaho.com/blog/2006/05/benchmarks-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapaninaho &#124; Photoshop 10 (CS3) Beta Benchmarking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kristianoffinland.com/blog/?p=9#comment-928</guid>
		<description>[...] action that is used to do this benchmark. Also, you can find the other, earlier, benchmarks from here.         &#8249;Previous Post Finally something I can replace my iPod with Next Post MacWorld 2007 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] action that is used to do this benchmark. Also, you can find the other, earlier, benchmarks from here.         &lsaquo;Previous Post Finally something I can replace my iPod with Next Post MacWorld 2007 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spaghetti</title>
		<link>http://tapaninaho.com/blog/2006/05/benchmarks-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>spaghetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kristianoffinland.com/blog/?p=9#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I thought I&#039;d test this again after installing some extra RAM. Here&#039;s the spec:

Power PC G5 Quad 2.5GHz 4GB RAM

So without a restart and after running the G5 for a few days solid, the action came in at 1 minute dead - which is slower than my previous test!?

After a restart performance increased, with a time of 39.26secs.

Now I should go and do something more interesting...! Anyone got some freshly painted walls??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I&#8217;d test this again after installing some extra RAM. Here&#8217;s the spec:</p>
<p>Power PC G5 Quad 2.5GHz 4GB RAM</p>
<p>So without a restart and after running the G5 for a few days solid, the action came in at 1 minute dead &#8211; which is slower than my previous test!?</p>
<p>After a restart performance increased, with a time of 39.26secs.</p>
<p>Now I should go and do something more interesting&#8230;! Anyone got some freshly painted walls??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://tapaninaho.com/blog/2006/05/benchmarks-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kristianoffinland.com/blog/?p=9#comment-4</guid>
		<description>MacBook 2Ghz 2Gb 80Gb came at 2:10. New user, nothing else running and had let it cool down. Sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MacBook 2Ghz 2Gb 80Gb came at 2:10. New user, nothing else running and had let it cool down. Sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://tapaninaho.com/blog/2006/05/benchmarks-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 20:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kristianoffinland.com/blog/?p=9#comment-2</guid>
		<description>An email recieved from Alex explaining his method of running the benchmark.

&lt;p class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;&quot;my methodology was,

mac os 10.4.6
photoshop 9.0

not after a fresh restart, machine had probably been on for a few days.
quit all other apps except menu meters.
open image, run action

photoshop in foreground the whole time (actions usually run faster if ps is not the foreground app)

timed action by watching the clock in System Preferences &gt; Date and Time on my laptop. click go on the action at say 12:01:00 look at clock again when action stops. approx 12:01:32. did this a few times and took most consistent reading.

will run it again if you want to check.

photoshop probably had the disable virtual memory buffering plugin installed (this is to fix a bug on machines with &gt;4GB ram).


Alex Kent&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An email recieved from Alex explaining his method of running the benchmark.</p>
<p class="quote">&#8220;my methodology was,</p>
<p>mac os 10.4.6<br />
photoshop 9.0</p>
<p>not after a fresh restart, machine had probably been on for a few days.<br />
quit all other apps except menu meters.<br />
open image, run action</p>
<p>photoshop in foreground the whole time (actions usually run faster if ps is not the foreground app)</p>
<p>timed action by watching the clock in System Preferences > Date and Time on my laptop. click go on the action at say 12:01:00 look at clock again when action stops. approx 12:01:32. did this a few times and took most consistent reading.</p>
<p>will run it again if you want to check.</p>
<p>photoshop probably had the disable virtual memory buffering plugin installed (this is to fix a bug on machines with >4GB ram).</p>
<p>Alex Kent&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darina</title>
		<link>http://tapaninaho.com/blog/2006/05/benchmarks-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Darina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 08:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kristianoffinland.com/blog/?p=9#comment-3</guid>
		<description>very interesting, yes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting, yes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
